<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jackbook.com has been deindexed from Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newsknot.com/2009/10/jackbook-com-has-been-deindexed-from-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newsknot.com/2009/10/jackbook-com-has-been-deindexed-from-google/</link>
	<description>News, Videos, Sport, Entertainment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:12:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://newsknot.com/2009/10/jackbook-com-has-been-deindexed-from-google/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsknot.com/?p=577#comment-110</guid>
		<description>On your site there were multiple posts promoting the same episode. It was as if you had rewritten the title to try and target as many different keywords as possible. I&#039;m not going to lie, a lot of my posts will seem rather low on content but they are still useful as they actually have working streams. This is just my opinion and of course you&#039;re allowed your own, different, opinion.

I hope that you get back up the rankings and I greatly respect your site. In fact, I made my site because I was in awe of how popular your site was despite focusing on one particular niche. I made it to try and replicate the success you have had.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On your site there were multiple posts promoting the same episode. It was as if you had rewritten the title to try and target as many different keywords as possible. I&#8217;m not going to lie, a lot of my posts will seem rather low on content but they are still useful as they actually have working streams. This is just my opinion and of course you&#8217;re allowed your own, different, opinion.</p>
<p>I hope that you get back up the rankings and I greatly respect your site. In fact, I made my site because I was in awe of how popular your site was despite focusing on one particular niche. I made it to try and replicate the success you have had.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://newsknot.com/2009/10/jackbook-com-has-been-deindexed-from-google/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsknot.com/?p=577#comment-109</guid>
		<description>what&#039;s spammy about our posts?  We posted on movies and tv shows just like whats on your site.

In fact, many other sites copied our posts because we always had fresh content.

What happened is that we included a pop-up from Clicksor that apparently had some malware fake antivirus ad and we got punished for it.

If Jacky indeed bought and sold links, that may another factor keeping us from getting back up.

Yes, we were deslisted but your reasoning is dead wrong and insuations that are posts were spammy even though you posts on very same topics is a bit unfair, if not, hypocritical</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what&#8217;s spammy about our posts?  We posted on movies and tv shows just like whats on your site.</p>
<p>In fact, many other sites copied our posts because we always had fresh content.</p>
<p>What happened is that we included a pop-up from Clicksor that apparently had some malware fake antivirus ad and we got punished for it.</p>
<p>If Jacky indeed bought and sold links, that may another factor keeping us from getting back up.</p>
<p>Yes, we were deslisted but your reasoning is dead wrong and insuations that are posts were spammy even though you posts on very same topics is a bit unfair, if not, hypocritical</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
